Kangana Ranaut’s Controversial Tribute: Downplaying Gandhi on His Birth Anniversary Sparks Outrage

Shaurya Sharma
3 min readOct 3, 2024

--

In a recent social media post, Kangana Ranaut, the actor-turned-politician and BJP MP, ignited a fresh controversy by downplaying Mahatma Gandhi’s significance on his birth anniversary. This incident has reignited discussions about her previous contentious statements and the implications of her political role.

On October 2, which marks both Gandhi Jayanti and the 120th birth anniversary of former Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri, Ranaut made a statement that many perceived as diminishing Gandhi’s stature as the Father of the Nation. In her Instagram story, she wrote, “Desh ke pita nahi, desh ke to lal hote hai. Dhanye hai Bharat ma ke ye lal,” translating to “The country does not have fathers; it has sons. Blessed are these sons of Mother India.”

This remark quickly drew criticism from various political leaders and sparked a heated debate on social media.

Backlash from Political Leaders

Congress leader Supriya Shrinate was among the first to respond, condemning Ranaut’s comments as a “lewd jibe” at Gandhi. She accused Ranaut of creating unnecessary divisions between Gandhi and Shastri, stating, “Will Narendra Modi wholeheartedly forgive his party’s new Godse devotee?” Her remarks highlight the sensitivity surrounding Gandhi’s legacy in Indian politics and the potential repercussions for those who challenge it.

Manoranjan Kalia, a senior BJP leader from Punjab, also criticized Ranaut for her statements. He expressed concern that her controversial remarks could harm the party’s image, emphasizing that politics is a serious matter that requires careful consideration before speaking out. Kalia remarked, “In her short political career, she has developed a habit of making controversial statements.”

This incident is not an isolated one for Ranaut. Just last month, she faced backlash for advocating the return of three farm laws that were repealed in 2021. Her comments during the farmers’ protests were inflammatory, suggesting that they were leading to a “Bangladesh-type situation in India.” Following widespread outrage, she retracted her statements and acknowledged her dual role as an artist and a BJP member.

The Broader Context

Ranaut’s latest comments come at a time when political rhetoric in India is increasingly polarized. The ongoing debates about historical figures like Gandhi reflect deeper ideological divides within Indian society. Gandhi’s philosophy of non-violence and his role in India’s independence movement continue to be revered by many, while others seek to reinterpret his legacy in contemporary contexts.

The backlash against Ranaut underscores the delicate balance politicians must maintain when discussing revered figures like Gandhi. Her remarks have not only drawn ire from opposition leaders but have also prompted criticism from within her own party, indicating that even within BJP ranks, there are concerns about her approach to sensitive topics.

Conclusion

Kangana Ranaut’s controversial remarks about Mahatma Gandhi have reignited discussions about respect for historical figures in Indian politics. As she navigates her dual identity as an artist and politician, the implications of her statements will likely continue to resonate within political circles and among the public. The reactions from various political leaders illustrate the complexities of engaging with India’s rich historical narrative while addressing contemporary issues.

As this controversy unfolds, it serves as a reminder of the responsibilities that come with political office and the need for thoughtful discourse in a diverse society. For many Indians, figures like Mahatma Gandhi are not just part of history; they embody ideals that continue to shape national identity and values today.

--

--

Shaurya Sharma
Shaurya Sharma

Written by Shaurya Sharma

Pop culture whiz. Social Media junkie. Web guru. Unapologetic Trash TV connoisseur. I write more than I read. Talk to me about all things Tech.

No responses yet